I
believe that genres completely matter. Therefore, a book should be completely
true if it is going to be called non-fiction. Why? Because everyone likes to
read different things. For example, I am someone who enjoys reading non-fiction
because I think that stories become more interesting when they are true. Also,
some people may use non-fiction to learn about the world and if children are
reading a book that claims it is a true story about monkey’s who flew to the
moon on a banana then the world will become stupid. I think half-truths are
okay only if the book is “based on a true story” or fiction. I think that it
does matter that Frey said his book was a memoir, even though he lied in it
because if he lied in it he could have just said it was “based on a true story”
which would have allowed him to avoid the negative publicity.
I think
Shields is wrong about saying that genres don’t matter. I think genres help
people to decide what type of books they enjoy reading so when Shields asks, “Why
does it matter to put the book in a genre?” it makes me want to respond to him by saying, "What is the harm in it?" I think his question is silly.
The genre is not hurting the books story or making it not as good, in my
opinion. If people think a story seems good or interesting they would probably
read it regardless of the genre, but that doesn’t mean genres shouldn’t exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment